|
Post by nubstee on Jun 17, 2016 23:18:24 GMT 2
Im talking to someone who is running an alliance thats pretty much on par with ours. We might be considering merging both alliances with a secondary alliance. Im not necessarily sure who would be in control of which, and who would get swapped around, but if we get to work out the kinks, this could be big for us.
Obviously i have some concerns about jumping into this, but the guy seems to know what he's doing and i know we all want better teammates. So let me know what your opinions are, and any questions or concerns you might have. I want to get back to him as soon as possible, and if we can, merge before i leave for vacation.
|
|
|
Post by malikking1983 on Jun 17, 2016 23:29:09 GMT 2
Would we merge to theirs or would they merge to ours?
|
|
|
Post by nubstee on Jun 17, 2016 23:32:24 GMT 2
That question still stands. I dont think they would have a problem merging with us, but they do have more than 8 active people that would be merging, So we would most likely bring all of the guys over 100k into one alliance at first to draw more attention.
I would think since i already have the secondary alliance set up, everyone else could join that one. The alliance will most likely swing in our favor, but just keep an open mind for now.
|
|
|
Post by jhanson1995 on Jun 17, 2016 23:38:16 GMT 2
this sounds like it would be pretty difficult to go through with. Especially when you'll have to articulate who stays and leaves for players youve never played with before. Idk I'm biased. I'm obviously one of the weaker guys.
|
|
|
Post by nubstee on Jun 17, 2016 23:41:28 GMT 2
We pick up people we've never played with before all the time, and theyre usually shit. Besides we wouldnt be getting rid of anyone. They have weak guys too. We might just re-arrange players to make killing bosses easier. Everyone who is actually active has no reason to worry.
|
|
|
Post by malikking1983 on Jun 17, 2016 23:56:04 GMT 2
Guess i better get to 100k quick like
|
|
|
Post by tomahawk on Jun 18, 2016 0:13:31 GMT 2
I'm good with it.
|
|
|
Post by rayray504 on Jun 18, 2016 0:21:48 GMT 2
Who's to decide who stays and who goes? Im for whatever yall wanna do as long as they active. We do need more active players tho...and people who can follow directions
|
|
|
Post by nat3yboy on Jun 18, 2016 0:25:20 GMT 2
If we can get it to work I'm down sounds pretty cool
|
|
|
Post by kenneth1978 on Jun 18, 2016 0:50:16 GMT 2
This sounds like a good idea to me. We have kind of reached a point now where progression has slowed down a bit and this might give us the boost we need to take the next steps. It would be great if we get to a stage where we are running 3 AQ and 3 AW BGs all the time. The 2nd alliance would also work as a nice feeder alliance as well where by the top guys in that can transition to the 1st one if someone quits or is kicked. It would also give is more scope to follow through on threats to kick people not pulling their weight as there will always be someone willing to take their place.
|
|
|
Post by nubstee on Jun 18, 2016 2:22:19 GMT 2
If you guys want, i can give you his tag. He seems like a really cool guy so anything you ask him he'll probably answer.
|
|
|
Post by jhanson1995 on Jun 18, 2016 2:37:52 GMT 2
If there's going to be 2 alliances with one essentially being a feeder, what's the initiative for those guys in the second one to stay? Cus I'm assuming the 2nd one will be significantly weaker than the first and most likely weaker than than our alliance right now. I don't mean to come off as negative, I just want to understand the plan better. And nubs yeah, give us the alliance tag if you can.
|
|
|
Post by nubstee on Jun 18, 2016 2:53:56 GMT 2
Nah im thinking we'd just allocate different players to optimize both alliances. But if we're being honest, it really just comes down to whoever is in this forum. The rest may either be kicked or forced into another alliance.
Also keep in mind that this is just an idea. Its not set in stone so we dont have to go through with it if the majority doesnt want to.
|
|
|
Post by hendersoncale23 on Jun 18, 2016 3:04:57 GMT 2
Sounds like it could work. McRib
|
|
|
Post by malikking1983 on Jun 18, 2016 4:41:17 GMT 2
I think it would be awesome to have 30 active people we would be able to do SA every week we would make rank on every event with 3 active groups in AW and AQ we would get better rewards and we would get 4 and 5* shards way faster
|
|